logo
About  |  Contact Us  |  Register |  Login  |  Logoff
 
 
Full Photo Gallery ( 10 pictures )
Top Ten Cars That Killed the Brand
Posted 2010/07/22 @ 10:00 AM
By Myles Kornblatt


As the death of Ford’s Mercury brand begins to set in, we started to wonder where to place the blame. It wasn’t one single car that brought down the marque of the Grand Marquis.  Instead, it was an entire identity that went undefined for more than a decade that turned this once strong brand into a badge marked for death.

Mercury wasn’t alone on this road. Brands like Oldsmobile, Plymouth, and Saturn could no longer cut out a clear path in the market, and they were eventually sent away. In fact, it is rare when one car can be the silver bullet that brings down the entire brand.

That started the debate in the office about the single cars whose presence on the dealer lots became death blow to the brand. We went searching for the cars that brought down an entire global operation, but we couldn’t find enough vehicles that bombed that badly (thankfully). So we included some cars that didn’t kill the badge internationally, just in the U.S. There are some cars that didn’t make the list, so feel free to add them in the comments section.

(in alphabetical order):



Edselcovered cars are headed in your direction

It is easy to start this list with the car that is synonymous with failure. Remember, Edsel was not a Ford car (like the Thunderbird or Galaxy,) but its own brand designed to fit a mid-price gap in the corporate lineup.

Ford wanted to keep these cars a surprise, and it did not even bother to gauge design input from the public. Instead the cars were transported in secret to their local dealers. There was even an ad campaign with the tagline “Covered cars are headed in your direction,” which showed Edsels masked by canvas on the back of car carriers.

So when the Edsel was first uncovered at the dealers in 1957, it was also the first time Ford got public reaction to the brand. Ford wanted the vertical grille to be known as an “impact ring”, but instead most people had more negative words for it, including a comparison to a part of the female anatomy. The quirky styling compounded with a recession meant this premium-priced brand with the horse collar grille was already shot in the leg before it left the gate.

The new marque was put down a little over two years after it was introduced. Ford tried to improve the single-car brand (available in sedan, wagon, or convertible), but in the end, the Edsel was rumored to have lost between $250 and $300 million at the time (as much as $800 million in today’s money.)   From that point on, the brand that was named after the founder’s son became forever linked with failure.



Kaiser-Frazer Henry Jpaying more to get less

Kaiser-Frazer wasn’t the first company, nor the last, to decide a good way to make an inexpensive car is to limit the amenities. But the 1950 Henry J (named after the company’s founder) probably went too far when it considered the trunk lid an option.

The Henry J may have been the least expensive car in the Kaiser-Frazer lineup, but its price was comparable to larger Chevys and Fords. The competition also had many more standard features, including trunk lids.

By 1954 Kaiser-Frazer was cash-strapped.  Still, it decided the best evolution for the Henry J was to use its chassis for the Darrin sports car. This may have been the first fiberglass car made in the U.S., but its specialty status meant it would never be profitable. Kaiser-Frazer stopped making cars later that year, and focus was shifted to the company’s other brand, Jeep.



Morris Marina
where’s a piano when you need it?

There have been many British marques that have fallen during the reign of British Leyland’s great badge engineering fiascos of the 1960s and 70s. Once celebrated brands like Wolseley and Riley were slowly killed as their entire lineup became almost indistinctive from other cars in the British Leyland family.   But one BL car managed to kill a brand without sharing the recipe for the poison, the Morris Marina.

The Marina gets very little respect in the car community, but in its defense, it was never built to solider on for so long. British Leyland needed a rear-wheel drive car to take advantage of company fleet vehicles. The Marina was rushed into production in 1971 to replace an aging lineup. It was only supposed to last for about five years as a stopgap until plans for a quality sedan were finalized. But financial and labor troubles at British Leyland meant it was produced up until 1984 (counting the refreshed Ital also as the Marina.)

By the time this perpetually ill patient was taken off life support, it was too late for the Morris brand. British Leyland was now a much smaller company, and the similar Austin brand had a much stronger image than the one who had spent a decade and a half polishing a turd.

 


NSU Ro 80how many fingers am I holding up?

By the 60s the German company NSU had moved from motorcycle production into moderate success with small cars such as the TT and the Prinz. NSU had taken the logical first steps by basing much of its car’s engineering on its motorcycle heritage. But now it wanted to be a bigger player in the car game, and NSU needed a new engine for larger cars. The solution came in the form of a revolutionary design by Felix Wankel. The engine, which was eventually named after its inventor, used no pistons and had fewer parts than a traditional gasoline engine.

NSU was excited about this powerplant and installed the first version on its Prinz-based Spider in 1964. Happy with the high power and small size of the Wankel engine, NSU made plans for its first executive sedan, what would become the Ro 80.  Designer Claus Luthe, who would later go on to sketch classics like the first BMW 3-Series and the E28 5-Series, created an aerodynamic design far ahead of anything else coming out of the 60s.

The Ro 80 was released in 1967, and it gained acclaim, including the European Car of the Year award. But almost immediately NSU's fortunes took a turn for the worse.

NSU didn’t solve all of the Wankel motor’s initial problems before the car went into production. The cars broke down constantly. NSU didn’t fully anticipate this problem because the first Wankel car, the Spider, had sold in very low numbers. About three times more Ro 80s were sold in its first full production year than total Spiders made during its entire four-year run. And unlike the Spider, which was a car for playboys, the Ro80 was marketed to executives who expected reliable motoring.

At a time when NSU needed to cover the considerable development costs of the Ro 80, it was paying a hefty price in warranties. Dealership mechanics who didn’t know how to fix this new type of engine just replaced it with a brand new one. It was rumored that instead of waving at other Ro 80s, owners would hold up fingers to passing Ro 80 owners representing how many engines they had.

The mounting costs were too much for the relatively small NSU, and in 1969 it merged with the Volkswagen group to become know as Audi NSU Auto Union. The Ro 80 lasted until 1977, and when the car was retired, so was the NSU name. The car that was shaped like a torpedo had an engine that sank the company.

READ THE FULL STORY ON OUR SISTER SITE NEW CLASSICS CLUB



Oakland Pontiacthe only fortunate one on the list

Pontiac was created in 1926 to help bridge the gap between the Chevrolet and Oakland brands of General Motors. Although Pontiac was considered its own brand, its single car lineup and seamless relationship with Oakland meant it really just held the low-price rung on Oakland’s ladder.

The six-cylinder Pontiacs became so popular for their value that it overshadowed the rest of Oakland. By 1932 the entire Oakland lineup had been replaced with the Pontiac name.

This is possibly the most cheerful story because the Oakland brand ended in name only, but Pontiac’s fortunes didn’t last forever…



Pontiac Aztec horses don’t make good cars

If the Edsel failed because of a grille that looked like a horse collar, then the horse-faced Aztec was a guaranteed loser.

The concept for the Aztec had some appeal, but after enough engineering and accounting tweaks, the round a futuristic styling became ribbed and ugly. At its launch in 2001, the crossover SUV was marketed to younger people with an active lifestyle. Unfortunately, the never-get-you-laid styling was a hard sell. It also didn’t help that there was not much distinction from the minivan-based drivetrain.

This was the car that had the most debate in our office about making the list. There were some that felt there was more to the downfall of Pontiac than just the Aztec. After all, the Aztec was gone five years before the Pontiac brand disappeared.

In the end we decided that the Aztec was like taking a jackhammer to Pontiac’s foundation -- making it almost impossible for the brand to build a sold future. Once known as GM’s performance division, Pontiac continued to lose face every time the Aztec claimed a podium finish on lists naming the ugliest cars. The affects of this Aztec ensured that great cars like the G8 would never get the chance they deserved.

Pontiac soldiered on in a sort of punch-drunk haze until 2010.



Renault Alliance -- the Franco-American bore

The Renault Alliance is a French design built in an aging United States factory… In hindsight we all should have seen this bomb coming.

The Alliance was basically the North American version of the Renault 9. Where the 9 was a somewhat attractive car in Europe, items like the U.S.-spec bumpers doomed some of the style to get lost in the translation.

Plus, Renault’s partnership with the American Motors Corporation did not make for the best tie-in. The AMC factory in Kenosha, Wisconsin was hopeless outdated, so the car’s long-term durability reports were best described as sub-par.

Renault has never been known for its reliability in the U.S.  Its attempt at mass production in North America came at a time when imports from Japan provided a level of quality that overshadowed these Ameri-French cars. The Alliance was far from the success Renault needed, and it had to dump more money into its partnership with AMC. This led to cutbacks in France, and this contributed to the assassination of Renault’s chairman, Georges Besse. After Besse’s death, Renault pulled out of the U.S. market to focus more on domestic issues.

The Alliance was a large failure. It wasn’t reliable enough to be a good import, and wasn’t American enough inspire sales through patriotism…in other words, game over.



Rover 75 -- comfortably numb

Although a stiff breeze could have blown away the entire Rover Group in the late 90s, the Rover 75 makes the list because of who stood behind it: BMW.

In the 1990s BMW needed more production capacity, and it also needed to stabilize its business so it wasn’t as heavily depended on the Deutsche Mark (this was before the Euro was introduced.)   This led the German company to buy the Rover Group in 1994. It not only included prized brands like Range Rover and Mini, but it also had plenty of capacity at its British factories.

The main car business at Rover needed a big shot in the arm, and BMW decided a brand new premium model could fix everyone’s problems. BMW would help Rover build an executive-level sedan. This car would have a plush feel that would also serve as a good alternative to the sports-minded cars that came from BMW. The result was the Rover 75, a car that was as comfortable and posh as a sitting room armchair.

The 75 was a good idea, but it met a tough reality. Although it was built in England, the British were not too thrilled about the car. BMW had failed to recognize that Britain likes their home-grown cars to be innovative. The public didn’t remember stale cars like the Morris Marina (mentioned above) as much as they clamored for the clever packaging of the original Mini, multi-valve engine in the Triumph Dolomite Sprint, or Ferrari Daytona-like styling of Rover SD1. The Rover 75 was comfy, not modern.   Also, Rover was never a prestigious brand outside of Britain. So it not only found few takers around Europe, but it was hard for it to ever command a premium price.

BMW made a large investment in Rover with the 75, but the car went largely unloved and deeply discounted. And if BMW couldn’t make Rover profitable, then no one else would ever want to throw money at it again. BMW soon sent Rover to the wolves.

An ironic twist is that the when Chinese company now known as SAIC picked up the carcass of Rover, they used the Rover 75 for their projects because it was one of the few platforms that Rover owned. This means the car the killed Rover is the basis for the car that is currently reviving the MG brand in England.



Studebaker Avanti
your savior is your killer

By 1962, Studebaker was getting stale. The once cash cow Lark was now being overtaken by the larger domestic brands beginning to make smaller sedans. It needed something to get people back in the showrooms, and a sports car was the easiest way.

Everything seemed perfect - a new lightweight car with a distinctive shape. Studebaker even set a land speed record to promote it. The orders started pouring in, but Studebaker didn’t know how effectively build the car.

The company chose to make the bodies out of fiberglass, which was still a complicated and expensive process at the time. The Chevrolet Corvette had been the only other car to be mass-produced using the plastic body panels in production, and at this point Chevy had been doing it for less than a decade. Studebaker’s fiberglass bodies were not fitting correctly, and Studebaker did not have the cash to weather the storm of upset owners and canceled orders.

The car that was supposed to save Studebaker became the final nail in its coffin. The Avanti was dropped from Studebaker in 1963, and all car production ceased within four years.



Yugowe’re ending with an easy one

There is a big difference between inexpensive and cheap. Malcolm Bricklin has become infamous for providing the North America with plenty of automotive examples of the second description. It had been about a decade since Bricklin made the U.S. laugh at his SV1, so he went looking for his next automotive joke.

The Yugo was imported from the Zastava Automobile Company of Yugoslavia. When the first cars hit the North American shores in 1985, the 15-year-old Fiat design on which they were based meant the car was already out of date.

The Yugo was the cheapest new car in North America, and the build quality proved it. Eventually the best use for the little hatchbacks was art projects rather than transportation.

By the early 1990s, it didn’t matter if Yugo was going to try and overcome its failing U.S. emissions standards, because the factory was being bombed in the now war-torn Yugoslavia. Zastava would eventually rebuild and produce cars again for Eastern Europe, but after its first car’s reputation in North America, the Yugo brand was forever finished in the U.S.



Keywords: top ten Edsel Kaiser-Frazer Henry J Morris Marina NSU Ro 80 Ro80 Oakland Pontiac Aztec Renault Alliance Rover 75 Rover Studebaker Avanti Yugo


COMMENTS


 Comment by Knotts 

What about the Lancia Beta? Didn't the rust bucket cause Lancia to leave the US and the UK? That should be on this list.


 Comment by MylesKornblatt 

@Knotts...The Beta was one we debated for a while (especially if you include in the mix the Beta-based MonteCarlo and its failing brakes.) In the end we decided that Lancia had two cars killing its brand image at the same time. Although the Beta could have probably taken down Lancia all on its own, it had help from the notoriously unreliable Gamma...If we had to add one more to the list, I'd probably make another argument for the Beta.

Car Research

By Model
 
OR
By Market
Segment


 


Car Research


 


 

 



 

 

 




©2009 MotoBullet | Motobullet.com

Web Development & Design by Road Block Inc. - Chicago Web Design Company